Goat Production in West Region
Issue: Meat Goat Production, Management and Marketing
Work Group Names: Frank Craddock, Chad Coburn, Tommy Antilley, Brent Drennan, Wade Kirkwood
Region: WEST Circle which primary base program it addresses - ANR
Section 1. Relevance
Relevance is included to provide the reason the educational program should be developed to address the identified issue. Within the relevance section, there are several questions that must be addressed. This section will seek to address these.
Where did this issue surface?
Sources where issue surfaced: Method Selected
Texas Community Futures Forum _X_
County Committees _X_
Commodity / Industry / Special Interest Groups _X_
Specialist(s) ___
Other: ____________________________________________
What is the issue/problem?
With the elimination of the mohair incentive, Angora production has declined but there is still a need for meat goats to utilize poor forages and harsh conditions. Furthermore, they require less care and maintenance making them better suited for small landowners.
Problem size and scope? (How many people does it affect? How wide spread?)
Statewide
Problem severity? (How serious is this issue?) High
Description:
Target Audience? (Who does the problem impact and how many?)
Commercial producers, purebred or show animal producers , and small acreage landowners.
What are some general characteristics of the audience this program targets? How will you market this program to others?
The target audience has rapidly increase in numbers and includes large commercial operators, show animal producers, and small acreage landowners.
Section 2. Response
Response refers to how Extension intends to address the issue by developing an educational program.
State the goal of the program. This is a statement, usually general and abstract, of a desired state or outcome. It is usually one sentence. Example: To increase profits for beef cattle producers.
Goat producers use best management practices to improve profitability and sustain livestock production operations.
State the outcome objectives. These are the objectives that describe the intended results of a program (e.g. attitudes, knowledge, skills, adoption of practice/technology, change of behavior). Examples include:
-Participants will increase knowledge in beef cattle selection practices
-Participants will change their attitudes about higher education options
-Participants will exercise for at least thirty minutes three times per week
It is important to write objectives for each of the six levels of change that we have identified (if possible). Even though your program may only be teaching toward knowledge, another program may be teaching toward a behavior. Also, remember to make these as specific as possible.
Client Change |
At the end of this program, will.... |
Knowledge |
increase knowledge on.... - Fencing needs - marketing - predator control - selection - health management - alternative breeds - nutrition |
Skills |
develop skills.... - production management practices (fencing, selection, health management, etc., ...) |
Attitude |
change their attitudes pertaining to... - quality meat production - species interaction (with cattle) |
Behavior Change |
adopt.... - production management strategies |
New Technology |
adopt.... - knowledge of new issues such as cool, animal I.D. program, and scrapie program. |
Best Practice |
adopt ..... -best production management strategies |
Program Design. In the space below, provide an explanation of the program design. Try to list the topics that could be addressed under this issue. For example, if this was an educational program for new ranch landowners, topics could include: pond management, introduction to beef cattle production, introduction to wildlife management, and general landscaping. How would you deliver the subject matter to address this issue? There are many strategies to deliver information. It could be a newsletter series, a workshop, and a meeting once a week for six weeks to name a few. It could also be a combination of all of these. Also, try and list resources that could be used to help develop or provide existing curriculum to address the issue.
Topic (Subject Matter) |
Strategy to Deliver Content (Method) |
Existing Resource(s) |
Contact Person(s) (Includes CEA’s Specialists, Commodity Reps) |
Selection
|
Field days, seminars, newsletters, news articles, radio/tv, demonstration, website, internet |
Extension publications, Industry, website/internet, PowerPoint |
Frank Craddock, Kyle Eckert, Rick Machen, Industry Leader, CEAs, Agribusiness Reps |
Health Management |
Field days, seminars, newsletters, news articles, radio/tv, demonstration, website, internet |
Extension publications, Industry, website/internet, PowerPoint |
Frank Craddock, Kyle Eckert, Rick Machen, Industry Leader, CEAs, Agribusiness Reps |
Nutrition
|
Field days, seminars, newsletters, news articles, radio/tv, demonstration, website, internet |
Extension publications, Industry, website/internet, PowerPoint |
Frank Craddock, Kyle Eckert, Rick Machen, Industry Leader, CEAs, Agribusiness Reps |
Marketing |
Field days, seminars, newsletters, news articles, radio/tv, demonstration, website, internet |
Extension publications, Industry, website/internet, PowerPoint |
Frank Craddock, Kyle Eckert, Rick Machen, Industry Leader, CEAs, Agribusiness Reps, Jason Johnson, Wade Polk |
Fencing |
Field days, seminars, newsletters, news articles, radio/tv, demonstration, website, internet |
Extension publications, Industry, website/internet, PowerPoint |
Frank Craddock, Kyle Eckert, Rick Machen, Industry Leader, CEAs, Agribusiness Reps |
Predator Control |
Field days, seminars, newsletters, news articles, radio/tv, demonstration, website, internet |
Extension publications, Industry, website/internet, PowerPoint |
Frank Craddock, Kyle Eckert, Rick Machen, Industry Leader, CEAs, Agribusiness Reps |
Topic (Subject Matter) |
Strategy to Deliver Content (Method) |
Existing Resource(s) |
Contact Person(s) (Includes CEA’s Specialists, Commodity Reps) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 3. Results
The last section deals with evaluation of this program. The evaluation content should mirror the objectives that are outlined in section two. Please try and list some specific questions that should be asked to the target audience to determine if the intended change took place. List as many potential questions as possible. The goal here is to create a question bank for each client change level so that the educator can review these questions to see if any of them are relevant to their program. If they are, then they can use them to measure change in their program. Remember, not all evaluation strategies have to be written questionnaires. They may also be interviews, direct observation, or focus groups. Please describe your method in this section where appropriate.
Client Change Level |
Sample Questions (Review the objectives section to help place questions or statements in the space below) |
Knowledge |
Do you feel that your knowledge about effective predator control has improved due to this seminar? Do you feel that your knowledge about internal parasite management has improved due to this program. |
Skills |
Do you feel that your ability to effectively select goats has improved due to this program? |
Attitude |
Do you feel that you better understand that goat industry after attending this program? |
Behavior Change |
|
New Technology |
Did you adopt knowledge of new issues such as cool, animal I.D., and scrapie program?
|
Best Practice |
Did you adopt best production management strategies? |
Economic Indicators. Are there economic indicators that can be measured concerning this issue?
YES
Please list them below.
- Increase in goat numbers.
- Increase in goat producers.
Interpretation. The last step in the process is interpreting the results to our stakeholders. List internal and external stakeholders that would be interested in the results of this educational program. Do not forget to think about other state agencies and groups that would be interested in these outcomes.
Internal to Extension Stakeholders |
External Stakeholders |
Specialists Department Heads Regional Program Director County Committees Participants District Extension Administrators |
TSGRA Mohair Council of America American Boer Goat Association American Meat Goat Association International Boer Goat Association U.S. Boer Goat Association Farm Bureau |
Additional Resources. What additional resources are needed to address this issue? In other words, what is needed to design innovative programs that will impact our audiences? Use the space below or the back if needed.