![]() |
  |
Sponsored and Facilitated by: Blanco County Office Texas Cooperative Extension The Texas A&M University System |
Introduction
This report presents the results of the Blanco County Forum
conducted 3/4/04 in Johnson City. This Forum is part of the
Blanco County Futures Forum coordinated by the Blanco
County Extension Office. Such events are being held in every Texas
county as part of the Texas Community Futures Forum, a state-wide needs
assessment sponsored and facilitated by Texas Cooperative Extension.
Texas Community Futures Forum
County-level involvement in the Texas Community Futures Forum began in January 1999, with Texans from all segments of the population participating. Citizens in every county were asked to study, discuss and define their communities' current and future needs. Because the populations of Texas counties vary widely, within the framework of the Futures Forum a "community" may be a neighborhood, town, county or region.
Texas Cooperative Extension facilitated the partnering of county government, state agencies, organizations, businesses and other groups to gather information about local needs and issues, and then helped organize action teams to address them. This was an ambitious undertaking. It was also a unique opportunity for many groups to work together in meeting the needs of Texans in the 21st Century.
The 2004 Texas Community Futures Forum process builds off of the previous effort to once again gather information about local needs and issues in all 254 counties. This information will be shared with all of Extension's partners and used as the basis for Extension's long-range outreach education plan for 2005-2008. Extension educational programs, which are available to all Texas residents, will be developed in response to community needs and in conjunction with participating partners.
The products and benefits of this process will be many. All of the issues identified locally will be posted on the Internet for county government, state agencies and other organizations and groups to review and use in developing their own strategic plans. The results from all counties will also be compiled and analyzed in light of trend data to create a comprehensive report. This report will be available to all partners in the Texas Community Futures Forum and to others on request. The information will help all groups to more directly focus their activities and resources; it also will reveal areas of common interest in which partnering groups can work together to solve community problems.
Participants in the Blanco County Forum
On 3/4/04, 16 individuals attended the Blanco County Forum. They represent a cross-section of county residents, public agencies and businesses in the area. This forum was facilitated by the following individual(s): Stephen Zoeller, Jay Kingston, Angela Weborn, Gretchen Sanders.
Purpose of the Blanco County Forum
The purpose of the Forum was to solicit and prioritize citizens' opinions about the most important needs and concerns in Blanco County. A modified Nominal Group Technique was used to conduct the forum.
The County Forum Agenda
Introductions and Overview: The Forum began with a general session to review the overall agenda, discuss the facilitation process and rules, and pose the question to be considered. Participants were then divided into 2 small groups.
Small Group Session: Participants were asked to respond to the following question:
Participants recorded their responses on paper. These items were displayed for all small group participants to see. Items were then grouped and edited by participants to eliminate duplicates and combine similarities. In the last step of the small group session, each person was allocated ten votes (represented by adhesive dots) to be used among the items he or she believed to be the most important. The outcome was a group consensus for the relative importance of the items. The top-ranked items from each small group were reported in the large group session. All items generated in small groups are in appendix 1.
Large Group Session: First, duplicate and similar statements from the 2 groups were edited to eliminate redundancies. Using the voting procedure described above, participants then voted for the items they considered most important.
A final step in the process gave the participants an opportunity to identify entities in the county which are best positioned to work on the issues identified. Participants were asked to respond to the following question:
Which entities (agencies, organizations, community groups, etc.) are positioned to best address these issues?
Information from this step was recorded for each of the top-ranked issues. Results of this part of the process are provided below.
Priority Needs in Blanco County Identified by Participants in the County Forum
The following table reports the final rank of items generated by the Blanco County Forum.
Table 1: Critical Issues and Entities Identified in Blanco County, 3/4/04.
| Rank (Vote) | Description | Entities/Organizations Involved |
| 33 | Ensure quality & quantitiy of water in anticipation of growth through effective land stewardship. | Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Blanco-Pedernales Underwater Groundwater District, Lower Colorado River Authority, Guadalupe Blanco River Authority, Texas Water Development Board, Texas Cooperative Extension, County Commissioners Court, Municipalities. |
| 25 | Need youth activities to reinforce morals, ethics, quality of life at youth center: character building, healthy lifestyles programs. | Health Department, ISDs, 4-H, Texas Cooperative Extension, Churches, Service Organizaitons: Lions, Masonic Lodge. |
| 25 | Increase in primary and tertiary medical care for all ages. | Health Department, Emergency Services Auxilary, Capital Area Rural Transportation Service, Hill County Memorial Hospital, Women, Infant & Children, Medicaid. |
| 23 | Decrease property taxes. | Legislative Special Session. |
| 22 | Develop greater to services for transportation, emergency and social services. | County Commissioners Court, Cities, CAPCO, Texas Cooperative Extension, Rehabilitation commission, School districts, churches. |
| 20 | Strengthen and create/develop/grow existing educational opportunities. | ISDs, workforce commission, Texas Cooperative Extension, CAPCO, colleges and universities, churches. |
Note: Items are the actual and unaltered responses submitted by the participants. Any discrepancy between an item listed here and the same item in the small group listing (see appendices) is due to editing by participants in the general session. The numbers in the Rank column represents the number of votes participants gave to the corresponding item. Higher numbers denote greater importance.
Future Plans for the Blanco County Community Futures Forum
The Futures Forum process gives residents of Blanco County the opportunity to identify critical issues that affect them, their families, and their communities. Many local and area agencies and organizations want input from local residents to better focus their activities and resources. Working together, such groups can plan individual, joint or coordinated actions to effectively address a county's or community's critical needs.
Note: Small group results are reported here as they were submitted; they have not been edited or changed in compiling this report.
Items Identified by Participants of Small Group(s), Blanco County Forum, 3/4/04.
| Small Group # |
Vote | Description |
| 1 | 13 | Ensure quality & quantitiy of water in anticipation of growth. |
| 1 | 8 | Community Activities for Youth that reinforce values, ethics & morals. |
| 1 | 13 | Decrease property taxes. |
| 1 | 8 | Vocational education opportunities. |
| 1 | 12 | Primary & tertiary medical care for all ages. |
| 1 | 16 | Manage services for growth, including: transportation, emergency services, and social services. |
| 2 | 9 | Water quality/quantity to include growth/supply, septic concerns, & conservation. |
| 2 | 5 | Small acreage landowner stewardship. Using land in responsible way. Farmers Market development. |
| 2 | 9 | Youth activity center. |
| 2 | 3 | Youth and adult interaction. |
| 2 | 3 | More youth activities. |
| 2 | 2 | Alcohol abuse by youth. |
| 2 | 7 | Lower taxes: property, school, user fees. |
| 2 | 4 | Job opportunities/awareness. Job training. |
| 2 | 4 | Distance learning. Higher education accessible. |
| 2 | 5 | Elder care and support. |
| 2 | 7 | Medical Care and support. |
| 2 | 7 | Rural public transportation. |
| 2 | 1 | Affordable housing development. |
| 2 | 2 | Qualified early childhood providors. |
| 2 | 5 | Better access to social services. |