Caldwell County Forum



















  Sponsored and Facilitated by:
Caldwell County Office
Texas Cooperative Extension
The Texas A&M University System
Caldwell County Forum

Introduction
This report presents the results of the Caldwell County Forum conducted February 2, 2004 in Lockhart, Texas. This Forum is part of the Caldwell County Futures Forum coordinated by the Caldwell County Extension Office. Such events are being held in every Texas county as part of the Texas Community Futures Forum, a state-wide needs assessment sponsored and facilitated by Texas Cooperative Extension.

Texas Community Futures Forum
County-level involvement in the Texas Community Futures Forum began in January 1999, with Texans from all segments of the population participating. Citizens in every county were asked to study, discuss and define their communities' current and future needs. Because the populations of Texas counties vary widely, within the framework of the Futures Forum a "community" may be a neighborhood, town, county or region.

Texas Cooperative Extension facilitated the partnering of county government, state agencies, organizations, businesses and other groups to gather information about local needs and issues, and then helped organize action teams to address them. This was an ambitious undertaking. It was also a unique opportunity for many groups to work together in meeting the needs of Texans in the 21st Century.

The 2004 Texas Community Futures Forum process builds off of the previous effort to once again gather information about local needs and issues in all 254 counties. This information will be shared with all of Extension's partners and used as the basis for Extension's long-range outreach education plan for 2005-2008. Extension educational programs, which are available to all Texas residents, will be developed in response to community needs and in conjunction with participating partners.

The products and benefits of this process will be many. All of the issues identified locally will be posted on the Internet for county government, state agencies and other organizations and groups to review and use in developing their own strategic plans. The results from all counties will also be compiled and analyzed in light of trend data to create a comprehensive report. This report will be available to all partners in the Texas Community Futures Forum and to others on request. The information will help all groups to more directly focus their activities and resources; it also will reveal areas of common interest in which partnering groups can work together to solve community problems.

Participants in the Caldwell County Forum
On February 2, 2004, 46 individuals attended the Caldwell County Forum. They represent a cross-section of county residents, public agencies and businesses in the area. This forum was facilitated by the following individual(s): Sarah Montgomery, Lytle Arche. Other(s) supporting this effort included: Barbara Baker, Cassandra Baker, Gary Dickenson, Patty Haltom, George House, Elaine Kimbrough, Royce King, Laree Spiller, Norbert Vasquez.

Purpose of the Caldwell County Forum
The purpose of the Forum was to solicit and prioritize citizens' opinions about the most important needs and concerns in Caldwell County. A modified Nominal Group Technique was used to conduct the forum.

The County Forum Agenda
Introductions and Overview: The Forum began with a general session to review the overall agenda, discuss the facilitation process and rules, and pose the question to be considered. Participants were then divided into 7 small groups.

Small Group Session: Participants were asked to respond to the following question:

What are the critical issues facing people in our county over the next five years?

Participants recorded their responses on paper. These items were displayed for all small group participants to see. Items were then grouped and edited by participants to eliminate duplicates and combine similarities. In the last step of the small group session, each person was allocated ten votes (represented by adhesive dots) to be used among the items he or she believed to be the most important. The outcome was a group consensus for the relative importance of the items. The top-ranked items from each small group were reported in the large group session. All items generated in small groups are in appendix 1.

Large Group Session: First, duplicate and similar statements from the 7 group(s) were edited to eliminate redundancies. Using the voting procedure described above, participants then voted for the items they considered most important.

A final step in the process gave the participants an opportunity to identify entities in the county which are best positioned to work on the issues identified. Participants were asked to respond to the following question:

Which entities (agencies, organizations, community groups, etc.) are positioned to best address these issues?

Information from this step was recorded for each of the top-ranked issues. Results of this part of the process are provided below. Priority Needs in Caldwell County Identified by Participants in the County Forum
The following table reports the final rank of items generated by the Caldwell County Forum.

Table 1: Critical Issues and Entities Identified in Caldwell County, February 2, 2004.

Rank (Vote) Description Entities/Organizations Involved
72 Responsible Tax Base: homeowner and land owner bear burden; can it be stabilized; how to get more to pay for programs, employees; tax based incentives for business; do not eliminate open space appraisal. Tax Appraisal Board
49 Quality and Diverse Jobs: availability; selection; new. Work Force Commission, School Districts, Businesses, City Councils, Chamber of Commerces
43 Helping to Educate our Youth: teaching morality and ethics; lower class size and more teacher support; extra curricular and recreational activities; a better way to administrate schools; opportunities and excellence; increase in alternative funding. Texas Cooperative Extension Service, School Districts, School Boards
40 Vocational and Technical Training for Youth: teach basic skills for youth; expose youth to vocations alternative to college; build a skilled, young labor force. School Districts, Work Force Commission, Businesses, Farmers/ranchers, Technology Center, City Councils, Chamber of Commerces, RCAWDB, Passport Program-Cedar Park ISD
40 Attracting Businesses and Industry with Technology and Training: work force development; small business assistance; internet technology more pervasive; incentives. Technology Center, Work Force Commission, Businesses, Banks, City Councils, Chamber of Commerces
39 Improved Medical Care and Facilities: physician availability in time and skill; facilities to meet growing needs; knowledge and skills for improvement in personal and family health and nutrition. Texas Cooperative Extension Service, Hospitals, doctors, pharmacies, City Councils, Chamber of Commerces
35 Water Quality and Management: groundwater and surface management; improve management skills; long term control of underground water; flooding, drainage and pollution of surface water; water wise development using technology and environmental choices. Texas Cooperative Extension Service, Plum Creek Conservation District, Public Water Departments, County Water Suppliers
29 Infrastructure Development: road improvement; housing at affordable rates; providing electricity, sewer and water for proper development; traffic flow long range plans; safety around pedestrian and vehicle junctions. Texas Cooperative Extension Service, Chamber of Commerces, City Councils, Highway Department
22 Better Stewardship of the Land: land resource education, how to care for the land; keeping agriculture land in sustainable use; being environmentally concerned for water, air, pollution, wast and erosion on the rural landscape; proper care of animals and livestock in humane, healthy and sustainable manner, control of feral animals in rural population; management of development through proper code enforcement. Texas Cooperative Extension Service, Farm Service Agency, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Plum Creek Conservation District, Lucy Buck-CAPCO, Animal Control
14 Improvement in Public Service: law enforcement and safety. Fire Department, Police Department, EMS, Sheriff

Note: Items are the actual and unaltered responses submitted by the participants. Any discrepancy between an item listed here and the same item in the small group listing (see appendices) is due to editing by participants in the general session. The numbers in the Rank column represents the number of votes participants gave to the corresponding item. Higher numbers denote greater importance.

Future Plans for the Caldwell County Community Futures Forum
The Futures Forum process gives residents of Caldwell County the opportunity to identify critical issues that affect them, their families, and their communities. Many local and area agencies and organizations want input from local residents to better focus their activities and resources. Working together, such groups can plan individual, joint or coordinated actions to effectively address a county's or community's critical needs.

Appendix

Appendix 1. Small Group Issues

Note: Small group results are reported here as they were submitted; they have not been edited or changed in compiling this report.

Items Identified by Participants of Small Group(s), Caldwell County Forum, February 2, 2004.

Small
Group
#
Vote Description
2 12 Attracting new businesses to county.
2 9 Adequate water supply.
2 9 Technical training in Caldwell County.
2 7 Improved medical care and facilities in the county.
2 7 Property taxes.
2 5 Nutrition in the county.
2 5 Quality jobs and diverse jobs.
2 5 Overcrowded schools.
2 4 Affordable high speed internet.
2 4 Cohesiveness between communities and county.
2 3 New development and traffic.
2 0 Water management flooding and drainage.
1 14 City and county medical services.
1 10 Taxation.
1 10 Water quality.
1 9 Youth.
1 9 Schools deficiencies.
1 9 Affordable living quarters.
1 9 Animal control.
3 15 Responsible taxing.
3 8 Jobs.
3 6 Health care - availability of doctors, nurses, hospitals, EMS.
3 6 Education.
3 5 Controlled development through enforcement.
3 4 Water.
3 4 Change tax base.
3 2 Transportation.
3 1 Tax breaker for industry.
4 9 Property taxes.
4 8 Industry.
4 7 Skilled labor force.
4 6 Water.
4 4 Jobs.
4 4 Vocational and technical programs.
4 4 Public education.
4 3 Health.
4 2 Transportaion.
4 2 Affordable housing.
4 1 Air quality.
5 13 Edonomic development.
5 12 Land resource education.
5 12 Maintenance agriculture value for taxation.
5 11 New industry changing demographics.
5 2 Future tax increases.
6 15 Economic development.
6 12 Education issues.
6 12 General government issues.
6 11 Infrastructure improvement and maintenance.
6 5 Safety.
6 3 Food supply.
6 1 Recycling.
6 0 Health care.
7 7 Crime prevention. Law enforcement.
7 7 Additional medical facilities.
7 6 Safer crosswalks and bike lanes in the communities.
7 6 Continuing educational and vocational training for high school graduates.
7 5 Business recruiting; Creating jobs.
7 4 Lack of water.
7 3 More recreational activities for the youth.
7 2 Government leadership.
7 2 Affordable high speed internet alternatives.
7 2 Lower to low middle housing.
7 1 Property taxes.
7 1 Rural development.
7 1 Better roads and bridges.
7 1 Better management and leadership of the school board.